Thursday, January 29, 2009
How Much Money Per Hour To Run A Pedistool Fan
Beware the City for work on the Castle Bishop's Castle
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Gay Cruising Areas In Sacramento
-Extraordinary meeting of Coordination Committees of the Associations
On 15 January at 21 was held at the headquarters of "Moving South" in vico S . Nicola No 6, a special meeting of the Coordination of Associations and Movements.
After CC on 13 January last he had the first point on the nose cone to illustrate the project interventions to be implemented in "Curtis" of Bishop's Castle, there is a clear need on the part of associations and movements operating in the area as well as free citizens sensitive to the fate of our Castle, to come together to understand the indifference of our administration about the concerns amply on several occasions in relation to the intervention being carried out.
Without going into technical and administrative details, which will be subject to further investigation, I believe it is necessary to explain briefly what has been happened.
In March 2008 a meeting was convened to inform the Office of the Plan have taken a project approved by the Town Council and the Cultural Heritage Office whose purpose is, precisely, the arrangement of the court of the Bishop's Castle.
For the uninitiated, the Office of Plan is an institutional body recognized specifically designed with the purpose to oversee public and private interventions to be implemented in the historic district.
At that time, representatives of these associations, they noted that there was no point calling the Planning Office in games played, with the sole purpose of publicizing the operation.
On October 27, 2008 was convened in haste, a second session of the Office of the Plan because administrators are part of the office, felt the need to "enlighten" the people "naive and uninformed" which, in Meanwhile, they initiated a petition to oppose such a project and raised so much fuss about an issue that you wanted to run quietly.
the unwary and uninformed citizens, showing a basic common sense,
ever wondered how to spend public money on a property owned by the Archbishop and with a lease expiring in 2012 and requested, in any event, if not there were priority actions with respect to the paving of Curtis.
At that time, the representative of the pro Historical Center, raised a number of concerns that, at the express request of that, they were put on record, just because there remained a trace.
These findings do not in any way tarnished the certainties of our directors and design engineer, who, for the umpteenth time merely to illustrate the project.
Despite such indifference and the absence of a full adversarial, worthy of a democracy, the Old Town and the Association Movement pro Lu Lauro, comforted by more than 300 signatures, on November 17, 2008 In addition, under art. 49 of the Municipal Statute, a request for a popular initiative in asking, as a last resort, the annulment of Resolution of Board Order Number 648 of December 21, 2007 containing the subject: "Building completion restoration south east wing of the Bishop's Castle - Approval of final design. "
It reiterated in that home, the concern about the intervention of the court floor, which tends to cancel a peculiarity of the bishop's castle grottagliese. For Administrators
sensitive, everything would have been enough to stop and reflect and perhaps to revise, in accordance with the design engineer, the areas of intervention.
But this is clearly not feeling at home in the Palace of our city and here at the CC on 13 January, rather than opens open a wider debate and perhaps review the project, we merely reaffirm the goodness of the action, calling the design engineer to illustrate, for the umpteenth time, his project.
This lack of democracy, masked by a pseudo willingness to listen, have further shaken the attention of citizens and associations to be receptive to that, naturally, thought it appropriate to meet in extraordinary session to decide what action to take to avoid what appears to be a foolhardy action, pointless and intended to erase a piece of our history and a peculiarity of our castle.
It still does not share the modus operandi of our directors with respect to actions of such importance and that both affect the cultural and historical fabric of our city.
not enough, in our opinion, appear willing to listen and then continue to pursue their own choices, ignoring the comments and associations of free citizens who have voluntarily signed the petition. 
On 15 January at 21 was held at the headquarters of "Moving South" in vico S . Nicola No 6, a special meeting of the Coordination of Associations and Movements.
After CC on 13 January last he had the first point on the nose cone to illustrate the project interventions to be implemented in "Curtis" of Bishop's Castle, there is a clear need on the part of associations and movements operating in the area as well as free citizens sensitive to the fate of our Castle, to come together to understand the indifference of our administration about the concerns amply on several occasions in relation to the intervention being carried out.
Without going into technical and administrative details, which will be subject to further investigation, I believe it is necessary to explain briefly what has been happened.
In March 2008 a meeting was convened to inform the Office of the Plan have taken a project approved by the Town Council and the Cultural Heritage Office whose purpose is, precisely, the arrangement of the court of the Bishop's Castle.
For the uninitiated, the Office of Plan is an institutional body recognized specifically designed with the purpose to oversee public and private interventions to be implemented in the historic district.
At that time, representatives of these associations, they noted that there was no point calling the Planning Office in games played, with the sole purpose of publicizing the operation.
On October 27, 2008 was convened in haste, a second session of the Office of the Plan because administrators are part of the office, felt the need to "enlighten" the people "naive and uninformed" which, in Meanwhile, they initiated a petition to oppose such a project and raised so much fuss about an issue that you wanted to run quietly.
the unwary and uninformed citizens, showing a basic common sense,
ever wondered how to spend public money on a property owned by the Archbishop and with a lease expiring in 2012 and requested, in any event, if not there were priority actions with respect to the paving of Curtis.
At that time, the representative of the pro Historical Center, raised a number of concerns that, at the express request of that, they were put on record, just because there remained a trace.
These findings do not in any way tarnished the certainties of our directors and design engineer, who, for the umpteenth time merely to illustrate the project.
Despite such indifference and the absence of a full adversarial, worthy of a democracy, the Old Town and the Association Movement pro Lu Lauro, comforted by more than 300 signatures, on November 17, 2008 In addition, under art. 49 of the Municipal Statute, a request for a popular initiative in asking, as a last resort, the annulment of Resolution of Board Order Number 648 of December 21, 2007 containing the subject: "Building completion restoration south east wing of the Bishop's Castle - Approval of final design. "
It reiterated in that home, the concern about the intervention of the court floor, which tends to cancel a peculiarity of the bishop's castle grottagliese. For Administrators
sensitive, everything would have been enough to stop and reflect and perhaps to revise, in accordance with the design engineer, the areas of intervention.
But this is clearly not feeling at home in the Palace of our city and here at the CC on 13 January, rather than opens open a wider debate and perhaps review the project, we merely reaffirm the goodness of the action, calling the design engineer to illustrate, for the umpteenth time, his project.
This lack of democracy, masked by a pseudo willingness to listen, have further shaken the attention of citizens and associations to be receptive to that, naturally, thought it appropriate to meet in extraordinary session to decide what action to take to avoid what appears to be a foolhardy action, pointless and intended to erase a piece of our history and a peculiarity of our castle.
It still does not share the modus operandi of our directors with respect to actions of such importance and that both affect the cultural and historical fabric of our city.
not enough, in our opinion, appear willing to listen and then continue to pursue their own choices, ignoring the comments and associations of free citizens who have voluntarily signed the petition.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)